When choosing a Claude model, we recommend first evaluating these factors:
Knowing these answers in advance will make narrowing down and deciding which model to use much easier.
There are two general approaches you can use to start testing which Claude model best works for your needs.
For many applications, starting with a faster, more cost-effective model like Claude Haiku 4.5 can be the optimal approach:
This approach allows for quick iteration, lower development costs, and is often sufficient for many common applications. This approach is best for:
For complex tasks where intelligence and advanced capabilities are paramount, you may want to start with the most capable model and then consider optimizing to more efficient models down the line:
This approach is best for:
| When you need... | We recommend starting with... | Example use cases |
|---|---|---|
| Best model for complex agents and coding, highest intelligence across most tasks, superior tool orchestration for long-running autonomous tasks | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Autonomous coding agents, cybersecurity automation, complex financial analysis, multi-hour research tasks, multi agent frameworks |
| Maximum intelligence with practical performance for complex specialized tasks | Claude Opus 4.5 | Professional software engineering, advanced agents for office tasks, computer and browser use at scale, step-change vision applications |
| Exceptional intelligence and reasoning for specialized complex tasks | Claude Opus 4.1 | Highly complex codebase refactoring, nuanced creative writing, specialized scientific analysis |
| Near-frontier performance with lightning-fast speed and extended thinking - our fastest and most intelligent Haiku model at the most economical price point | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Real-time applications, high-volume intelligent processing, cost-sensitive deployments needing strong reasoning, sub-agent tasks |
To determine if you need to upgrade or change models, you should: